May 4, 2015

Ex Machina. Machinic Utterances and Aesthetic Self-Reclamation

How Guattari’s Subjectless Action and Ethico-Aesthetics can be useful in post-digital culture and thinking with the film, Ex Machina.

This is the second of a two-part reflection on the movie Ex Machina (Alex Garland 2015). Part one is here.


“Savage voices and voices of the people, mad voices and infantile voices define the places where it becomes possible and necessary to write. Voices furnish the hermeneutic with its condition of production, that is, with the sites it occupies where it converts them to text.” Michel De Certeau, Vocal Utopias: Glossoalias.

 “The mouth no longer speaks, it drinks the letter.” Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, Anti-Oedipus.

“Since improvisation has become one of the methods of artistic expression, it turns out to have not been a dream. It is just something like a pathway into a dream. Intuition comes from perspective. An intuition stands up in a single stroke, and then creates a fringe.” Min Tanaka, Machinic Eros: Writings on Japan.

 

To further explore both the notion of artificial intelligence, its relation to consciousness, as well as its relation to the production of art, it can be useful to return to the groundbreaking work of Félix Guattari and his conception of subjectless action. Guattari reminds us that, in the realm of language, we can always replace any pronoun with “it”. [1] He immediately reminds us of how we can dig into the molecular and de-territorialized nature of machinic utterances in recognizing that ‘It’:

. . . does not represent a subject; it diagrammatizes an agency. It does not over-code utterances, or transcend them as do various modalities of the subject of the utterance; it presents their falling under the tyranny of semiological constellations whose only function is to evoke the presence of a transcendent uttering process; it is the a-signifying semiological matrix of utterances –the subject par excellence of the utterances – in so far as these succeed in freeing themselves from the dominant personal and sexual significations and entering into conjunction with machinic agencies of utterances. [2]

Guattari comments on thinking the “it” from a position that frees itself from the over-coding of utterances. This leads Guattari to see the potential for a-subjectifying utterances to shed any attachments to a particular subject, a “he” or “she”, a “masculine” or “feminine”, in effect, to the binaries of subject and object. However, in freeing themselves from the dominant personal and sexual significations, as the utterance par excellence, “it” nevertheless has to contend with the a-signifying utterances’ relation to de-territorialization, as well as the relentless encoding and overcoding of meaning. Guattari refers to the latter as the despotic formalism of a writing machine. That is to say the official writing machine, where the “primitive” writing machines relinquish themselves to the control of what he refers to as “the signifying machine of double articulation”.

In falling under the control of the double articulation of the official writing machine, Guattari states that a power machine cannot be separated from the nomadic military machine. It is here that we have what would appear to be the dead-end of a-signifying [3] figures of expression. That is to say, we have the introduction of a grammaticality: The letter castrates the voice by dividing speech up into phonemes, and the voice mutilates the diagrammatic potential of an arche-writing by re-arranging words according to meaning. [4] The desiring utterances and intensities, he continues, end up finding themselves already then arranged around a world governed by mental representations and what he will call a fictive subject. This is not without extreme interest for us here. A fictive subject is one whose power is derived from rendering it powerless. But perhaps, all is not lost for the subjectless, a-signifying utterances. Whereas at the level of the subject, that is the individual and the person, the pronominal “it” and arche-writings find themselves re-territorialized in the form of a fictive and powerless subject, and within a grammaticality that no longer allows for the flow of a-signification. Guattari insists that the nullifying desire of the fictive subject can still find a means of semiotic escape via the a-signifying figures of expression. This is achieved by way of beginning new desiring machines whereby reflexive consciousness can “abolish itself in the paroxysm of joy of a machinic consciousness that has truly broken all territorial moorings.” [5] The a-signifying machines, for Guattari, find themselves outside the reach of what he describes as the “impotentizing attacks of reflexive consciousness” [6]. This leads Guattari, in a somewhat ironic manner, to find these new potentiations within the act of “making conscious”. If Descartes’ cogito is considered a potential escape from a-subjectivation into a retrieval of the so-called thinking subject (the I that thinks), for Guattari, this escape is still a fiction; and more specifically, a machine-fiction. [7] Following Guattari’s line of reasoning, making conscious involves such an intensity and degree of de-territorialization that it, in essence, becomes detached from all reference points. And this brings us back to our discussion on the future of the unconscious and the digital in regards to Lydia Liu’s comments regarding artificial intelligence and post-digital communication, where we find ourselves confronted with either the Freudian Robot or the Buddha Robot.

At the extreme limit of “making conscious”, where Guattari sees us at the extreme limit of de-territorialization, we discover that consciousness is not faced with the binary of opposition between being and nothingness, but is precisely both all and nothing. From then on, there are only two options for Guattari that begin to sound like Liu’s comments of the Freudian Robot or the Buddha Robot. Guattari states that within this black hole of de-territorialization consciousness has either the option of asceticism or castration. Or perhaps a third option: a new economy of de-territorialization with super-powerful sign-machines capable of coming into direct contact with non-semiotic encodings. In the case of Ex Machina, Ava could be much more than a mere simulacrum of the human or its evolutionary progress. More interestingly enough, she could be thought of as a new economy of de-territorialized paryoxmal joy of a consciousness that is both all and nothing; a sign-machine that is capable of coming into direct contact with non-semiotic-codings, that is, a human-bartleby machine of collective intelligence, of micro-expressions and artistic hope. Opposed to the I-Ego economy, Ava could also be the incarnation of a molecular a-subjective, subjectless humanity. A Buddha robot? A Freudian Robot? A human(e) robot…

ex

Guattari asks another important question in his later work, Chaosmosis (read the first chapter here) that can be useful for us here in thinking our relation to social network culture and artificial intelligence: “How can a mode of thought, a capacity to apprehend, be modified when the surrounding world itself is in the throes of change?” Indeed, if we continue thinking this provocative question put forth by Liu’s book on the future of the unconscious in relation to the human’s machinic extension with artificial intelligence, then Guattari’s attempts at a capacity to apprehend and modify a mode of thought within a tumultuous time of accelerated change is as prescient as ever. Guattari’s concerns and hopes bring us to the necessity of rigorously critiquing our relations to the past. Is there a manner, in striving to think within the throes of change as Guattari was striving to do himself, where we can take on a perhaps a uchronic position toward the past? That is to say, to think a parallel past that didn’t take place. A thought experiment that provokes an alternative future-past in order to think with and against Liu’s provocations of the Freudian Robot, where the Freudian Unconcious is precisely replaced with another ethico-aesthetic practice. This was Guattari’s hope. An attempt to move away from a past where “The Freudian Unconscious is inseparable from a society attached to its past, to its phallocratic traditions and subjective invariants.” [8]

So, how do we move beyond the past? How do we move past the phallocratic traditions and its subjective invariants? In the aftermath of emancipatory politics and within a current age of media deliriums, where we are all allowed to scream and cry our outrage and become the users and producers of media and the illusions and dreams of detournements of Debord have been given to us all within the virtual-actual spaces of social networks; or at least, keeps us chained to a Freudian unconscious (a Freudian Robot). The question, Ex Machina then brings to the forefront, is more than a simple question of Feminist emancipatory politics, it’s a position outside of striving perhaps to take on the compulsion of consumption today: the consumption and compulsion to Identify, to share Identification, and to consume Identity. Then, how can we begin to grasp a capacity to think within the ever-changing landscape today in a manner where we take up a mode of consumption that would be akin to a capacity and novel mode of thinking within our current landscape of post-digital culture?

As Michel De Certeau reminds us, there were once certain methods and modes of reading where what was necessary was an art of the ruminatio, of “slow reading”, or a slow consumption that is a manner of “swallowing” and “digesting” the texts [9]. This manner of reading dates back to the 12th century and it has a direct relation to questions of memory, knowledge retention, that perhaps for us today, can be a useful measure for thinking and pairing De Certeau’s historical analysis of this process. To think how we can consume the identities, image-text modes of exchange, and consumption in order to begin to think types of novel, ethico-aesthetic practices of “slow eating and slow reading” of our cultural and digital image-text utterances. This entails us not purely to “chew”, which is to “ruminate”, but also “swallow” and “digest” them in manners that allow, shall we say, for healthful digestion of knowledge, and perhaps more importantly, emancipatory, humane modes of exchange. Social networks remind us all too well that our identities themselves have become at once artistic and performative processes and simultaneously mere goods of exchange. If this is true, then for us to reclaim our identities and a “second of self” as Wallace Stevens speaks of in regards to the power and proper reading of poetry, then this poetic reclamation of identity against mere assimilation within the exchange value of semio-capital is a good place to start. As Bifo Berardi reminds us, poetry is perhaps one of the only expressions that doesn’t fit into capital manipulation. [10] Poetry as the insolvency of language.

If Ava puts on a different dress that is identical to the one seen worn by the artistic image of the woman in the Klimt painting (which is interestingly enough a portrait of Wittgenstein’s sister [11]). Perhaps it is fruitful to view this poetic gesture as the aesthetic identity of self-creation or self-reclamation; moving outside from the painting of a fixed image-identity, which is parallel to the identities we create online and where the identities are merely assimilated into code and the echo chambers of noise. Thus, Ava does not need to identify with humans as such, but rather with the creation of artwork itself. In this way, Ava becomes a human as artwork in progress. Like us all: our identities always already in flux and in the end, containing the potential ethico-aesthetic practices of self-care. If poetry is, for Berardi, perhaps one of our only hopes in staving off complete exhaustion and subjugation to capital, then within social network shared utterances, a movement from (information) noise to poetic musicality, to a machinic glossolaliac speech (improvisational digital speech (as) music as shared prayer) is perhaps a place to begin thinking our shared potentials for reclaiming speech in the post-digital era. De Certeau calls these spaces Vocal Utopias [12] and I’m writing at great length on this topic for another project. But what Ex Machina and these blog reflections have helped to remind me of is the necessity to create various modes of poetic articulation (in this case, in the form of ink-paintings on mulberry paper) and to recognize the necessity and capacity for creative improvisation [13] in art and theory practices. The poetic movement between intuition and humane gesture. A musicality of arche-writing. De Certeau explains to us that “For the glossolalist, though, the starting point that calls forth the song is not even a line: it is only an ‘air’ of beginning.” [14] A tracing of shared poetic-glossolaliac voice that we all share within our social network exchanges. As Guattari reminds us with his exuberance for autopoeitc processes akin to Jazz and Rap as well as the return of machinic orality in post-media culture: “Orality, morality! Making yourself machinic […] can become a crucial instrument for subjective resingularization and can generate other ways of perceiving the world, a new face on things, and even a different turn of events.” [15] I leave the reader with one more improvisational artwork and thank them for entertaining my reflections on the film and my poetic attempt to begin once again.

 

SM       Drew Burk, Notes on Vocal Utopias: Musicalité de l’archi-écriture, 2015.

 

NOTES:
[1] Félix Guattari, trans. Rosemary Sheed, Molecular Revolution: Psychiatry and Politics, Peregrine Books, 1984, p. 135.

[2] Ibid.

[3] For more on Guattari and a-signfying semiotics cf. Gary Genosko’s paper A-signifying Semiotics in The Public Journal of Semiotics II(1), January 2008, pp. 11-21: http://journals.lub.lu.se/ojs/index.php/pjos/article/view/8822/7920.

[4] Molecular Revolution: Psychiatry and Politics, p. 136.

[5] Ibid. p. 137.

[6] Ibid. p. 137.

[7] Ibid. p. 137.

[8] Félix Guattari, Chaosmosis: an ethico-aesthetic paradigm, trans. Paul Bains and Julian Pefanis, Sydney, Power Publications, 1995.

[9] Cf. Michel De Certeau, Ed. Luce Girard La Fable Mystique: Tome II, Editions Gallimard, Paris, 2013, p. 210.

[10] Cf. Bifo Berardi, The Uprising: On Poetry and Finance, Semiotext(e), 2012.

[11] I would like to thank Trent Knebel for pointing this illuminating fact out to me.

[12] Cf. Michel De Certeau’s Vocal Utopias: Glossolalia in Representations, No. 56, Special Issue: The New Erudition (Autumn, 1996) pp. 29-47.

[13] As Min Tanaka states in dialogue with Félix Guattari, “Generally, freedom cannot be taken into account if some fiction precedes it. One has to adopt a perspective as an ensemble of thoughts, that is, an improvisation which always exists “between” them. One might understand that playing more freely or anarchically is an improvisation, yet nothing proceeds well without recognizing what enables improvisation. Since improvisation has become one of the methods of artistic expression, it turns out to have not been a dream. It is just something like a pathway into a dream. Intuition comes from perspective. An intuition stands up in a single stroke, and then creates a fringe.” Cf. Félix Guattari’s Machinic Eros: Writings on Japan, Univocal: Minneapolis, 2015 p. 51.

[14] Michel De Certeau, Vocal Utopias: Glossolalia in Representations, No. 56, Special Issue: The New Erudition (Autumn, 1996) pp. 29-47.

[15] Félix Guattari, Chaosmosis: an ethico-aesthetic paradigm, trans. Paul Bains and Julian Pefanis, Sydney, Power Publications, 1995 p. 97.

More Articles from &&&

Ruangrupa: Contemporary Art or Friendship Industry?*

In the past two decades, more than in the past hundred years, authoritarian regimes have risen to power globally. Today, fascist parties are occupying seats in many countries’ governments, such as in the Israeli Knesset, the Dutch Tweede Kamer, the American Congress, and the German Bundestag. Meanwhile, the collective memory of European fascism and its… Read More »

Call the Bronze Age… they forgot their pictograms!

“In the preceding chapter we discussed the development of technoeconomic organization and the establishment of social machinery closely connected with the evolution of techniques. Here I propose to consider the evolution of a fact that emerged together with Homo sapiens in the development of anthropoids: the capacity to express thought in material symbols. (…) As… Read More »

Interferential Axiology: Excess & Disruption

What is tragic about choice is no longer fundamental if choice is no longer what establishes communication between an independent city and an independent individual as substances. —Gilbert Simondon1   Excess and disruption are different modes of systemic interferences, providing differing sets of axiological implications. This essay seeks to explore their tragic interface in the… Read More »

Here & Elsewhere, at War, & Into the Future

The Middle East continues to painfully be a primary site for the blood-drenched transformations of our planetary geopolitical system. However, about ten years ago and during another Israeli operation in Gaza, an uncanny timeliness opened an unexpected connection between global contemporary art and geopolitics in August 2014 when, following the escalation of Israel’s Gaza operations,… Read More »

Zionism Reconsidered

The seminal essay below by Hannah Arendt, spanning 15,000 words was first published in the Menorah Journal in October 1944. This work was inspired by the meeting of the World Zionist Organization’s American section in Atlantic City. This congress was notable for its assertive call for a Jewish state covering the entire territory of Palestine,… Read More »

The Dead God, A short story in two parts

Things had been getting strange at the firm, since the boss had come back from holidays. The black cape and the pile of Crowley books strewn about the office were the first clue. What was Hardeep, the Singaporean tech bro CEO, doing with all this, mused Pierre, a level 7 sales executive, en route to… Read More »

The Purist

Filipe Felizardo is a philosophy student, artist and musician from Lisbon, with an informal education in film, comics, and musical pedagogy. Currently a Researcher on Critical Philosophy at the New Centre for Research & Practice, Felizardo focuses on systematic reconceptions of learning and alienation, as understood from the workspaces of inferentialism, Marxist activity-approach, and anti-vitalism.

Retinol: A Mode of Action

“Condensed in a formula, the Technological Civilization can be characterized as the transition from ratio to generativity, from matter to process, from nature to the hybrid.” –Davor Löffler If we follow the self-avowed German Accelerationism and deep futurology of Davor Löffler (Löffler 2021), we can posit that everything is co-evolutionary and that there are no… Read More »

The Narcissist Image

In his course Deleuzian Aesthetics Fares Chalabi presents an extended typology of mutually exclusive, rigorously defined image-types, or what I like to call aesthetic structures or aesthetic logics. An image-type or aesthetic logic is a form that structures the entirety of a work of art – take, for example, the ‘series’. The logic of series,… Read More »

Sorry You Can’t Pass a Turing Test But I’m Different 

Five hundred million individuals tried to monetize their social media last year, according to a recent Linktree survey. As a lucky member of this esteemed group, I recently found myself surfing through the entrepreneurial side of TikTok, captivated by a video titled “How to make money with Chat GPT”. The clip tells you to go… Read More »

Unthought Apparitions

In this video essay, Brent Cox works through the poetry of Barbadian poet Kamau Brathwaite and his Sycorax Video Style, which he developed in the early 1980s using a Mac SE/30 and which offers myriad compelling extra-linguistic or extra-conceptual ideas in relation to citationality, literary convention, the constative/performative distinction, the temporality of neologisms, and the… Read More »

The Work of Art in the Age of Cybernetic Criticism

Walter Benjamin’s seminal 1935 essay “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” wrestled with the effects of powerful technologies upon culture, and presaged much subsequent writing, e.g. Martin Heidegger and Italo Calvino. Here I want to consider not the artwork-qua-object as in Benjamin, but rather the work of art as an active force, in… Read More »

Modern Art: A True Conspiracy

*Originally delivered as a response to Gertrude Stein’s “The Making of Americans” on Day 27 of Superconversations, a collaboration between e-flux and The New Centre for Research & Practice in 2015. The most recent wartime Christmas in New York was as cold and bright as any other holiday season had ever been in the city. As usual, a… Read More »

Cosmotechnics and the Multicultural Trap

1. Although still a young writer and researcher, it is probably not an exaggeration to say that Yuk Hui is already one of the most influential contemporary thinkers of technology working today. This position is certainly warranted by the strength and scope of his work, the expansive drive and breadth of which is inspiring, especially… Read More »

Pandemic, Time for a Transversal Political Imagination*

I: Symptoms With the omnipresence of the term “symptom” these days, it seems that a plausible escape from the deep horror of this pandemic would be to conduct a symptomatic reading of it. Attributed to Louis Althusser, this method of reading literary and historical texts focuses not on what a text evidently expresses, but on… Read More »

Generation Z: Invincible, Angry & Radical*

*Originally published by BBC Persian, to read the original, please click here.  Following the protests that are taking place in Iran after the killing of Mahsa Amini by the forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the attention of the people and the media has been drawn to the role, and strong presence of the… Read More »

A dialogue on Law & Platform Architecture

Note: This piece was co-produced as a dialogue in the manner of a feedback between the authors. They reacted to each other’s thoughts on Law about Space while having as a single rule that each would use a different language as a tool of communication. Zé would use written text, whereas Artemis would use visual expressions. When… Read More »

Arriving from the Future: Sinofuturism & the post-human in the philosophy of Nick Land & Yuk Hui

Modernity and technics “If you think about the Silk Road in the past, there’s this idea of eastern and western people meeting on some kind of big road and maybe selling and buying things. I think this history repeats itself, and some kind of new and interesting phenomenon is happening.” —Kim Namjoon, member of the group… Read More »

Artist as a Formal System: Towards a general theory of art

For the past few years, I’ve been engaged with writing a footnote to an essay with an attempted theoretical explication of what is meant by the word “art”. For a much longer time, I’ve pursued a very abstract but also very specific direction in my own art practice – like any other artist. One little… Read More »

On Daniel Hölzl’s Grounded

“Oil is the undercurrent of all narrations, not only the political but also that of the ethics of life on earth. This undercurrent material, petroleum narrates the dynamics of planetary events from macroscopic scales such as hot and cold wars, migrations, religious and political uprisings, to micro or even nanoscopic scales such as the chemical… Read More »

The Future History of Skills

We become what we behold. We shape our tools and, thereafter, our tools shape us. — John Culkin (1967) “A Schoolman’s Guide to Marshall McLuhan” (The Saturday Review) Human creativity is often driven by lateral thinking, which according to Margaret Boden has a weakness. She posits that AI can introduce better “standards of rigor, […]… Read More »

Babylonian Neo-mustaqbal: Continental Vibe and the Metaverse

My aim here is to venture a scholarly definition of the Continental Vibe, but allow me to arrive there via an anecdote, or an impression, really – one of my earliest memories of viewing the world as a cast of signs and symbols. A somersault of senses: visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory. A sum of building blocks and a bevy… Read More »

Telos at the End: A Meditation on Dysteleological Superintelligence

I proceed from an actual fact. For all the scenarios of existential risk from Artificial Intelligence/Superintelligence, there’s always been the same thing. There’s always been this aspect, put tacitly or implicitly, either merely enlisted, or considered to be decisive. And what is it? It is the presupposed teleology. Varying in movements and outcomes, all AI-concerned… Read More »

Second-order Design Fictions in End Times

This conversation on Second-order design fiction is part of an ongoing collective research project by Fry and Perera on Technology, Cosmotechnics, Design and Resistance. In their conversation Fry and Perera explore the concept of second-order design fiction (SoDF) as an emergent means of addressing how design is understood and practiced in the context of the… Read More »

Documenta 15: Captured & Content

Documenta 15, heterogeneous, accessible, resplendent in-process and incomplete, present-here-and-now, and affirmative, is soft-imperialist, globalist art at its apex. New Edge — it’s gentle, loving, soothing, and light, art for the righteous decline of the Western enlightenment project and paean for the rise of the Global South, salvaging what it finds useful from Western ruins, vainglory,… Read More »