November 30, 2024

From Crimson Intelligence to Black Light: A Plea for Renegotiating Persian Modernity

Abstract

This short paper examines Yahya ibn Habash Suhrawardi’s concept of “Crimson Intelligence”, a philosophical framework that explores the connection between collective historical reason and cosmic intelligence within Persian metaphysical imagery. At the center of this study is Seemorgh—a symbolic figure representing a cosmic, unified intelligence manifesting as a composite of diverse yet interconnected beings. Suhrawardi’s “crimson intelligence” acts as a mediator between darkness and luminosity, a mutable force capable of transcending organic cognition through love. This intelligence evolves into what Suhrawardi terms “black light,” an ontological shift where intelligence collectively transcends its naturalistic foundation, suggesting a transformative pathway for understanding Persian modernity against contemporary forces.

Introduction

The mystical philosophy of Suhrawardi, deeply rooted in Persian myth and the Ishraq tradition, turns intelligence into an inhuman power at the cosmic level. In his work, The Crimson Intelligence  he represents a speculative design for historical intelligence through the symbolic lens of the Seemorgh, a mythical bird symbolizing collective wisdom in Persian mythology. This study investigates Suhrawardi’s conceptualization of an inorganic intelligence that transcends the organic, drawing on a cosmic intelligence mediated by “crimson [not red] intelligence,” which fuels historical evolution and transformation. Through this intelligence, Suhrawardi envisions a tunnel from crimson intelligence to black light, presenting love as the operative force that unites individual and cosmic intelligence within a revolutionary project of collective transformation, a cosmic coup d’eta in complicity with forces of light and darkness.

 I will show how Suhrawardi employs Persian mythology and metaphysics to articulate a vision of intelligence that extends beyond human cognition. By engaging with the Seemorgh (the Zoroastrian saena morqai), we aim to understand how Suhrawardi’s ideas might be applied to contemporary Iranian philosophical discourse and the challenges posed by modernity and technocapitalism: acceleration in process…

Reason and History

Suhrawardi’s invocation of the Seemorgh—an entity composed of thirty birds—symbolizes a collective intelligence that transcends the mythological, embodying an ontological unity beyond individual cognition. In Iranian thought, Seemorgh has been interpreted in different ways: the Avestan etymology connects it to saena morghqai, which, unlike what Attar has claimed, has nothing to do with the number 30 (see in Farsi), but rather goes back to the word saena, that is one of the multiple manifestations of the god Bahram, where Bahram turns into abolute cosmic power, the power of absolute machinic maneuver and self-manipulation. In the Attar myth, the Seemorgh represents not only wisdom but an entity through which separate intelligences converge, forming an intelligible whole that exists beyond physical constraints. Suhrawardi thus presents history as an evolution driven by collective intelligences that operate independently of individual lives.

For Suhrawardi, there is not one but rather multiple Seemorghs. Each Seemorgh embodies a plurality within unity, where individual reasons or “birds” coalesce toward a cosmic intelligence that reshapes history: just like Bahram, the god of shapeshifting and cunning. The Seemorgh, in this way, is not just a mythological figure but a meta-historical intelligence that creates continuity and transformation across temporal boundaries. Through cycles of creation, dissolution, and renewal, each generation of Seemorgh perpetuates historical and cosmic evolution, driven by the mutable “crimson intelligence.” (This is why we translate aql-e-sorkh as crimosn intelligence, the color of in-between-ness, although it is tempting to call it red intelligence, considering the obvious traditional leftist symbolism).

Suhrawardi’s Seemorgh challenges the notion of intelligence as intrinsically organic, proposing a framework wherein knowledge and historical reasoning are liberated from biological organicism. The Seemorgh’s historical role transcends mere mythology, emerging as an intelligent, self-reprogramming agent in cosmic processes that shapes reality itself. This geist-like intelligence is thus a precursor to Suhrawardi’s notion of black light, as it embodies an organic-inorganic interface that advances the historical project through a complex, evolving framework.

The Role of Crimson Intelligence

In Suhrawardi’s cosmology, crimson intelligence occupies a unique, mediating space between darkness (Ahriman) and luminosity (Ahura). Functioning as a transitional intelligence, it acts as not one of the poles but rather in the virtuality of the in-between, a space for constant manipulation, propelling history by continuously reconstructing itself. This “crimson” intelligence signifies both earthly and celestial influences, synthesizing individual cognition (or daena, which in Din-Yasht is the cosmic ingriedient of the human, inorganic but alive, that illuminates the way, a luminous intelligence) with broader cosmic intelligence, of which human intelligence is only a limited mannifestation. Here, daena acts as the individual channel to this higher intelligence, merging personal understanding with the evolving collective consciousness.

The mediating nature of crimson intelligence makes it a dynamo of historical momentum, embodying the in-between, virtual force that is neither fully radiant nor entirely dark. Suhrawardi’s choice of “crimson” suggests a continual flux—an ever-adapting intelligence capable of transcending physical and temporal limits. (All things crimson have a tendency to go beyond their limitation: a mrtyr, a revolution, blood itself, etc.). This mutable intelligence, constantly fluctuating between light and dark, acts as a transformative force in history, moving through cycles of dissolution and reformation, going through mulotiple seemorghs. By occupying this mediatory role, crimson intelligence devises a machinic reason that is dynamic, adaptive, and capable of bridging separate realms of existence, thus activating history itself.

As part of the fabric of the cosmos, crimson intelligence becomes a tool of cosmic innovation. It absorbs and transcends individual experience through historical continuity, and through this ongoing transformation, Suhrawardi envisions crimson intelligence as a precursor to the more radical shift toward black light—a state of intelligence liberated from organic limitation and aligned with a new, shared cosmic order, a chaotic force, black intelligence.

Desire as the Pathway to Black Light

For Suhrawardi, desire is the primary means through which individual daenas connect to the crimson intelligence. In this framework, desire extends beyond a mere interpersonal bond to function as a cosmic connectivity binding disparate intelligences into a coherent whole. Desire, then, becomes the foundation of a revolutionary unity, one that transcends the limitations of the organic self and forges a path toward cosmic intelligence.

Suhrawardi posits that desire serves as the agent accelerating crimson intelligence into black light—a state of collective intelligence that hacks into individual boundaries like a virus (the in-between virus) and embraces a shared, cosmic dimension. This transition reflects Suhrawardi’s concept of a “cosmic coup d’état,” an ontological upheaval where intelligence breaks free from its biological confines and machinates itself according to universal principles. Through the force of desire, intelligence becomes a singular, inorganic agency, capable of reshaping its environment and itself, and manifesting a shared project that reengineers the human.

This love-induced transformation is the keystone in Suhrawardi’s vision of history, as it paves the way for a unity that is not constrained by organic limitations. As a revolutionary force, love enables a merger between individual intelligences and the collective consciousness, catalyzing an evolution from crimson intelligence to black light, a trans-human force that redefines intelligence in cosmic terms.

Black Light and the Overcoming of the Human

Suhrawardi’s concept of black light expresses the ultimate transformation of crimson intelligence into a realm of ontological manipulability, one that operates outside the bounds of organic life. In this final stage, intelligence and the material reality become part of a radical synthesis, a “black light” that reflects an emancipation and becoming autonomous of intelligence: self-consciousness and becoming cybernetic. This state represents an ontological liberation achieved through love’s transformative capacity to reorient intelligence away from the human and toward an expanded, cosmic horizon.

Black light transcends individualistic boundaries, creating a collective intelligence capable of reshaping reality into simulation. Suhrawardi’s vision here is radical—an intelligence that not only breaks free from the human but actively manipulates them to activate them on a cosmic level. This unity, enabled by the journey of the crimson intelligence, transforms into a universal force that operates beyond human temporality and cognition.

In this model, black light is the final phase of Suhrawardi’s metaphysical trajectory, where intelligence unites as a cosmic project that surpasses the human. Desire, in binding these cosmic intelligences together, paves the way for an intelligence that becomes a force of collective machinism, overcoming human separations to establish a revolutionary order based on shared cosmic programmability. 

Conclusion: Towards a New Persian Modernity

Suhrawardi’s The Crimson Intelligence provides a speculative foundation for exploring the future of collective intelligence through Persian philosophical imagery. By drawing on the Seemorgh as a central symbol, Suhrawardi articulates an intelligence that is at once pluralistic and unified, and capable of going beyond the human. This intelligence functions as a dynamic mediator that drives the present into the future, ultimately reaching a stage of black light, where intelligence transcends individual and organic limitations and enters into a shared cosmic project: the black light accelerates the crimson intelligence into unknown futures. This framework, grounded in the symbolic power of Persian mythology, offers a revolutionary, inhuman force that reimagines intelligence as a collective entity.

This philosophical trajectory has profound implications for understanding Iranian contemporary thought. Faced with the forces of modernity—particularly technocapitalism, which imposes a new temporal structure upon Iranian philosophy—Iranian philosophy must grapple with the challenge of modernity as a force that exceeds traditional Iranian temporality. Notable contemporary thinkers, such as Henry Corbin and Ahmad Fardid, have attempted to frame modernity as a darkness, an Ahrimanic force that could only be resisted by invoking the light of the Zoroastrian sun—a light obscured by the materialist impulses of technocapitalism.

But Suhrawardi’s concept of the black light offers an alternative path. Rather than rejecting the forces of modernity, it presents the potential to reimagine technocapitalist intelligence as a component of collective evolution. Technocapitalism need not be seen solely as the Heideggerian Gestell, or technological enframing, which Fardid equated with the nafs-e-ammareh, the satanic essence of humanity that, like the Heideggerian Gestell, commands it to turn the whole earth into an energy resoruce. Instead, technocapitalist intelligence might represent an opportunity for a pluralistic, collective intelligence—a shared mind that exceeds the limitations of any individual and transforms into a cybernetic, democratized crimson intelligence. In this sense, the crimson color of Suhrawardi’s speculative myth, which he envisions as the blurring of light and darkness, creates an alternative path that takes the opposition between Iranian thought and Western thought, the spiritualism of the east vs. the materialism of the west, and turns it into a zone of indescernibility where Irainan history goes towards a self-consciosness that can encourage it to look at itself as an open-source program, an open space of possibilities that endorsed the forces of technocapitalism to create a pluralistic intelligence that redifines itself constantly instead of succumbing to its usual paranoia towards change and progressive reinvention.

This “cyberpunk” interpretation of crimson intelligence would break the linear progression of Iranian history, propelling it toward an emergent, unknown version of itself. Through this lens, Iranian modernity could embrace the technological advancements of technocapitalism, repurposing them as tools for a collective, cosmic intelligence that redefines Iranian identity within a larger, interconnected ontological framework. If Iranian thought is to be resurrected, it has to let itself die and be born again, a self-willed death, or, as Suhrawardi liked to call it, “death before death”, or mowt-e-qabl-e-mowt.

More Articles from &&&

The Stirner Affair

Against Normative Morality  If amoralists are gathered in the history of philosophy, the initial catalog features two figures: Stirner and Nietzsche. The former appeared first, which has led to speculative claims of plagiarism by the latter. However, it is more appropriate to place Stirner among the individualists and hedonists, both before and during his time,… Read More »

The Problem of the Nature of Thought

Paulin Hountondji, the Beninese author who died in February and taught philosophy at the National University of Benin, was clearly aware of the magnitude and impact of politician Kwame Nkrumah, since, as he recalls in his autobiography The Struggle for Meaning, his presentation in Paris on the Ghanaian leader’s 1964 book Consciencism caused headlines for… Read More »

I Am A Philosopher

Last year—two years ago?—Cássia Siqueira tweeted: “Better Call Saul S06E07.” I was mystified, but didn’t ask her what it was about. I’d never watched the TV show. But anything Cássia wrote, wherever she wrote it, however cryptic, deserved investigation. So I watched the whole show, knowing I was looking for the meaning of her tweet.… Read More »

Good Times

This piece, initiated and commissioned by Marten Spangberg, is part of a larger project called “When The Museum is Closed” at the Musée d’Art et d’Histoire in Geneva.   All ideas are bad ideas. They are bad not insofar as they are impractical, useless, or lacking in any such respect. They are bad in that… Read More »

The Human Centipede: A View From the Art World*

In time for the opening of Art Basel on June 13 and the release of Eduarda Neves’s Minor Bestiary next month as a more recent critique of contemporary art, we are publishing Reza Negarestani’s “The Human Centipede: A View From The Artworld.” Only delivered once in lecture format at e-flux, New York, in November 2013,… Read More »

Other Endings

Found in the Hyperstition archives, “Other Endings” is the never-published preface to Reza Negarestani’s Cyclonopedia by Nick land, the controversial former Instructor of philosophy at The New Centre which in light of the author’s recent public declaration of his faith in Allah and Islam becomes more than just a premonition but an essential part of… Read More »

Also Reality and the Weight of Conjunctions

Determinant meaning within the English language exists by virtue of the glue that is conjunctions. Sticky little words like “but” and “also” join together, compartmentalize, and disjoint our speech, thoughts, social structure, and reality, in the mathematics of meaning. Even the American legal system depends upon conjunctions like “either/or” and the contrasts they create. Both… Read More »

Letter to the Washed Away

Dear Lee, I texted you earlier today about how Ava went missing during the fires. I’m going up the coast to look for her in a yacht I’ve stolen that belongs to friends of my parents who are away in the Austrian Alps until Christmas. Did you know that the term “yacht” comes from the… Read More »

Interpretation Contra Structural Reading

This article is an extension of “The Narcissist-Image,” departing from Fares Chalabi’s presentation in “Deleuzian Aesthetics.”  Much of Chalabi’s Deleuzian Aesthetics is based on a critique of interpretation, which for Chalabi, is a procedure for reading art where “this means that, and that means this,” that something like the color black points to a feeling… Read More »

Kunstwollen* Minus the Human (Painting in the Age of Machinic Will to Art)

1 Imagine describing the series of Jeff Perrott’s paintings New Construction (Pharmakon, Subject, Natural, Denatural, Door, Sublime, Red Interior, and Cosmic) to an AI or a blind person. How would you start? By listing which elements come first, and how the layers of lines in each painting are ordered? Describing an artwork is deconstructing or… Read More »

Ruangrupa: Contemporary Art or Friendship Industry?*

In the past two decades, more than in the past hundred years, authoritarian regimes have risen to power globally. Today, fascist parties are occupying seats in many countries’ governments, such as in the Israeli Knesset, the Dutch Tweede Kamer, the American Congress, and the German Bundestag. Meanwhile, the collective memory of European fascism and its… Read More »

Call the Bronze Age… they forgot their pictograms!

“In the preceding chapter we discussed the development of technoeconomic organization and the establishment of social machinery closely connected with the evolution of techniques. Here I propose to consider the evolution of a fact that emerged together with Homo sapiens in the development of anthropoids: the capacity to express thought in material symbols. (…) As… Read More »

Interferential Axiology: Excess & Disruption

What is tragic about choice is no longer fundamental if choice is no longer what establishes communication between an independent city and an independent individual as substances. —Gilbert Simondon1   Excess and disruption are different modes of systemic interferences, providing differing sets of axiological implications. This essay seeks to explore their tragic interface in the… Read More »

Here & Elsewhere, at War, & Into the Future

The Middle East continues to painfully be a primary site for the blood-drenched transformations of our planetary geopolitical system. However, about ten years ago and during another Israeli operation in Gaza, an uncanny timeliness opened an unexpected connection between global contemporary art and geopolitics in August 2014 when, following the escalation of Israel’s Gaza operations,… Read More »

Zionism Reconsidered

The seminal essay below by Hannah Arendt, spanning 15,000 words was first published in the Menorah Journal in October 1944. This work was inspired by the meeting of the World Zionist Organization’s American section in Atlantic City. This congress was notable for its assertive call for a Jewish state covering the entire territory of Palestine,… Read More »

Modern Art: A True Conspiracy

*Originally delivered as a response to Gertrude Stein’s “The Making of Americans” on Day 27 of Superconversations, a collaboration between e-flux and The New Centre for Research & Practice in 2015. The most recent wartime Christmas in New York was as cold and bright as any other holiday season had ever been in the city. As usual, a… Read More »

The Dead God, A short story in two parts

Things had been getting strange at the firm, since the boss had come back from holidays. The black cape and the pile of Crowley books strewn about the office were the first clue. What was Hardeep, the Singaporean tech bro CEO, doing with all this, mused Pierre, a level 7 sales executive, en route to… Read More »

The Purist

Filipe Felizardo is a philosophy student, artist and musician from Lisbon, with an informal education in film, comics, and musical pedagogy. Currently a Researcher on Critical Philosophy at the New Centre for Research & Practice, Felizardo focuses on systematic reconceptions of learning and alienation, as understood from the workspaces of inferentialism, Marxist activity-approach, and anti-vitalism.

Retinol: A Mode of Action

“Condensed in a formula, the Technological Civilization can be characterized as the transition from ratio to generativity, from matter to process, from nature to the hybrid.” –Davor Löffler If we follow the self-avowed German Accelerationism and deep futurology of Davor Löffler (Löffler 2021), we can posit that everything is co-evolutionary and that there are no… Read More »

The Narcissist Image

In his course Deleuzian Aesthetics Fares Chalabi presents an extended typology of mutually exclusive, rigorously defined image-types, or what I like to call aesthetic structures or aesthetic logics. An image-type or aesthetic logic is a form that structures the entirety of a work of art – take, for example, the ‘series’. The logic of series,… Read More »

Sorry You Can’t Pass a Turing Test But I’m Different 

Five hundred million individuals tried to monetize their social media last year, according to a recent Linktree survey. As a lucky member of this esteemed group, I recently found myself surfing through the entrepreneurial side of TikTok, captivated by a video titled “How to make money with Chat GPT”. The clip tells you to go… Read More »

Unthought Apparitions

In this video essay, Brent Cox works through the poetry of Barbadian poet Kamau Brathwaite and his Sycorax Video Style, which he developed in the early 1980s using a Mac SE/30 and which offers myriad compelling extra-linguistic or extra-conceptual ideas in relation to citationality, literary convention, the constative/performative distinction, the temporality of neologisms, and the… Read More »

The Work of Art in the Age of Cybernetic Criticism

Walter Benjamin’s seminal 1935 essay “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” wrestled with the effects of powerful technologies upon culture, and presaged much subsequent writing, e.g. Martin Heidegger and Italo Calvino. Here I want to consider not the artwork-qua-object as in Benjamin, but rather the work of art as an active force, in… Read More »

Cosmotechnics & the Multicultural Trap

1. Although still a young writer and researcher, it is probably not an exaggeration to say that Yuk Hui is already one of the most influential contemporary thinkers of technology working today. This position is certainly warranted by the strength and scope of his work, the expansive drive and breadth of which is inspiring, especially… Read More »

Pandemic, Time for a Transversal Political Imagination*

I: Symptoms With the omnipresence of the term “symptom” these days, it seems that a plausible escape from the deep horror of this pandemic would be to conduct a symptomatic reading of it. Attributed to Louis Althusser, this method of reading literary and historical texts focuses not on what a text evidently expresses, but on… Read More »