Last year—two years ago?—Cássia Siqueira tweeted: “Better Call Saul S06E07.” I was mystified, but didn’t ask her what it was about. I’d never watched the TV show. But anything Cássia wrote, wherever she wrote it, however cryptic, deserved investigation. So I watched the whole show, knowing I was looking for the meaning of her tweet. I arrived upon it not knowing that I was actually watching the sixth season’s seventh episode, but I knew it when it hit me: it starts with a repetitive monologue by a person pushing shopping carts around a parking lot, claiming ad nauseam “I Am A Philosopher.” Some months earlier we were discussing “how and when can one claim to be a philosopher?.” Cássia—with all her skill and briskness and curiosity, beyond the technical credentials she’d been gathering in the last four years or more—doubted she could claim this of herself. I offered her my suggestion: I think that when one actively engages with philosophy, one is being a philosopher. Quite broad, quite narrow. But in tandem with a universalist stance we both share. In that sense, I do think a 4-year old can be a philosopher, maybe even more so than those who add ‘PhD’ to their Twitter handle. It’s not like “my 4-year old could’ve painted this”—more like a 4-year old will ask a question when many will content themselves with an answer.
This will be, I think, an eulogy for my late friend Cássia Siqueira. As I write this line I am not yet sure of the shape this will take. I am aware it was possibly suggested by reading a transcription of her friend J.-P. Caron’s words to the same effect, read at the beginning of the latest meeting of the CPC (Circuito de Pesquisas Contemporâneas—Contemporary Research Circuit), an online, transdisciplinary cohort of persons interested in accelerationism, philosophy, transfeminism (and much more!) mostly based in Brazil. Cássia was an important participant in this group. I will not compete with those physically or geographically closer to her in terms of the intensity of coping with her absence or comparatively measuring the sense of loss and the number of memories. This, because I think these are simply qualitative—myriad determinate instances of interacting with a friend who is present, in some way or another, in our lives. In that sense, incomparable. In another, beautiful, wealthy way, the same. With this in mind, I retained J.-P.’s words as more of a program than the sort of discombobulating eulogy I am enacting:
From the question Who is Cássia Siqueira?, I want to proceed to the question What is Cássia Siqueira?. The question is not an objectification. I’d say it is exactly the contrary. (. . .) That Cássia becomes to us an event and a mission seems self-evident to me. (my translation)1
I met Cássia soon after enrolling at the New Centre for Research and Practice, fascinated with neo-rationalism and xenofeminism. More or less around then we started following each other on Twitter. I quickly realized that Cássia actively, persistently posed those questions to herself. The affinity was instantaneous: in the Platonic framework, here was a soul-mate in the World Soul; someone who, in the broadest and narrowest possible senses, was set out to ask how things—selves included—hung together, in the broadest and narrowest possible senses. I borrowed Wilfrid Sellars’s idiom about the aim of philosophy in order to claim just that: I had met someone performing the aim of philosophy. Earlier today I recombined some aphorisms of mine to further claim that “a philosopher should become a system,” then that “a person should become a philosopher should become a system,” then—more narrowly and broadly—that “a system should become a philosopher if it should become a person.” The first time we collaborated, if I remember well, was more or less about questions surrounding this theme—a joint presentation for Mattin’s seminar on alienation. Right now, I just realized that this is not quite—it should really be stressed—about remembering Cássia, about holding myself captive to the joy of the cool stuff we did together. I want it to be yet another turn to our mentor J.-P.’s questions: pursuing his investigations of Nelson Goodman on art, of interest to us three as artists as well, perhaps it may be more appropriate to ask “When is Cássia Siqueira?,” in order to emancipate Cássia out of ordered time and recognize her project—her—as diachronic, returning to us from the future. A further remembrance may platform this: after reading her essay on Mattin’s My First 30 Min. On TikTok, I asked her to let me publish a portuguese translation in print. The very same essay touches upon what we were doing: meeting online halfway across the world, transforming our determinate sorts of disenfranchisement into something we could make further intelligible, alienating ourselves in the process, no matter if it was responding to each other on Twitter, providing supportive enthusiasm for each other’s endeavours, collaborating in a diagram for class, trying to grasp computer science among friends late into the night. In this specific regard—bootstrapping alienation—Cássia is coming back from the future right now: many times, her love for intelligibility took her many to exquisitely uncharted corners of the form of the inhuman. The core of my admiration for her mainly revolves around the realization that in these instances I asked myself “Is she really going to fuss around with that?” and then recognized that such doubt in myself can only come from fear. One affinity we share is the interest in the emancipatory potential of Reza Negarestani’s infantile schematism, the autodidactic plasticity required for ever revising the categories of the rational, for revising reason itself. For this one requires an absolute rejection of fear. How can one ask questions if still negatively constrained by timidity? How can one ask questions if not enacting radical honesty? If and whenever I emulate the circumstances in which Cássia realized herself in this fashion, Cássia is alienated from the future into such deed. It won’t be me. There and then is the event, in the space of possibilities made intelligible through Cássia’s questions. She is, to my mind, a very brave person. Just today I named someone else as model for me, in the sense of “a philosopher is their systematising” (in the infinitive, yes). It becomes helpful again, when I claim Cássia is a model to me. While perfectly aware I cannot generalize that everyone is a model to me, I can take it somewhat universally. First, in order to avoid any appearance of elitism. Then, to buttress the suggestion that models are for breaking—sometimes the models (kill yr idols, your Self among them), sometimes what they model. Once I wrote an essay titled “Beauty Lies in the Eye of the Emulators.” A juvenile attempt at a sort of Carnapian/Malaspinian pedagogy—something which Cássia did activate with methodological brilliance in her essay “Towards the subversion of the rough ground.” I am still fond of my essay’s title, though, because it compresses a bit of what I see in cherishing a model and using it for profound, bipolar, transformations: as opposed to simulation, emulation is open to contingency. In the former, there is no room for the intelligibility of error; whereas in the latter, error is the catalyst for determinately negating the model. The model breaks in its newfound limit; the modeled breaks—was Frankenstein’s chimaera a whole or the sum of its parts?—in its novel intelligibility. Beauty lies in this thin membrane where and when agency is reclaimed, when and where one proceeds beyond simulation and activates universality in oneself—necessarily activating the possibility of not being oneself. The Form of Abolition: this is what and when Cássia is, which, as she would observe, amounts to a radical—discrete in continuity, continuous in discreteness—subversion of heracliteanism.
The early demise of Cássia’s embodied personhood—but not her lifeforming (in the infinitive, yes)—leaves me with a new formulation of a question I ask of myself and every one; a question I think is the one asked proleptically by and to intelligence, out of love: When I model you, when is the error?
September 24, 2024
I Am A Philosopher
More Articles from &&&
I Am A Philosopher
Last year—two years ago?—Cássia Siqueira tweeted: “Better Call Saul S06E07.” I was mystified, but didn’t ask her what it was about. I’d never watched the TV show. But anything Cássia wrote, wherever she wrote it, however cryptic, deserved investigation. So I watched the whole show, knowing I was looking for the meaning of her tweet.… Read More »
Good Times
This piece, initiated and commissioned by Marten Spangberg, is part of a larger project called “When The Museum is Closed” at the Musée d’Art et d’Histoire in Geneva. All ideas are bad ideas. They are bad not insofar as they are impractical, useless, or lacking in any such respect. They are bad in that… Read More »
The Human Centipede: A View From the Art World*
In time for the opening of Art Basel on June 13 and the release of Eduarda Neves’s Minor Bestiary next month as a more recent critique of contemporary art, we are publishing Reza Negarestani’s “The Human Centipede: A View From The Artworld.” Only delivered once in lecture format at e-flux, New York, in November 2013,… Read More »
Other Endings
Found in the Hyperstition archives, “Other Endings” is the never-published preface to Reza Negarestani’s Cyclonopedia by Nick land, the controversial former Instructor of philosophy at The New Centre which in light of the author’s recent public declaration of his faith in Allah and Islam becomes more than just a premonition but an essential part of… Read More »
Also Reality and the Weight of Conjunctions
Determinant meaning within the English language exists by virtue of the glue that is conjunctions. Sticky little words like “but” and “also” join together, compartmentalize, and disjoint our speech, thoughts, social structure, and reality, in the mathematics of meaning. Even the American legal system depends upon conjunctions like “either/or” and the contrasts they create. Both… Read More »
Letter to the Washed Away
Dear Lee, I texted you earlier today about how Ava went missing during the fires. I’m going up the coast to look for her in a yacht I’ve stolen that belongs to friends of my parents who are away in the Austrian Alps until Christmas. Did you know that the term “yacht” comes from the… Read More »
Interpretation Contra Structural Reading
This article is an extension of “The Narcissist-Image,” departing from Fares Chalabi’s presentation in “Deleuzian Aesthetics.” Much of Chalabi’s Deleuzian Aesthetics is based on a critique of interpretation, which for Chalabi, is a procedure for reading art where “this means that, and that means this,” that something like the color black points to a feeling… Read More »
Kunstwollen* Minus the Human (Painting in the Age of Machinic Will to Art)
1 Imagine describing the series of Jeff Perrott’s paintings New Construction (Pharmakon, Subject, Natural, Denatural, Door, Sublime, Red Interior, and Cosmic) to an AI or a blind person. How would you start? By listing which elements come first, and how the layers of lines in each painting are ordered? Describing an artwork is deconstructing or… Read More »
Ruangrupa: Contemporary Art or Friendship Industry?*
In the past two decades, more than in the past hundred years, authoritarian regimes have risen to power globally. Today, fascist parties are occupying seats in many countries’ governments, such as in the Israeli Knesset, the Dutch Tweede Kamer, the American Congress, and the German Bundestag. Meanwhile, the collective memory of European fascism and its… Read More »
Call the Bronze Age… they forgot their pictograms!
“In the preceding chapter we discussed the development of technoeconomic organization and the establishment of social machinery closely connected with the evolution of techniques. Here I propose to consider the evolution of a fact that emerged together with Homo sapiens in the development of anthropoids: the capacity to express thought in material symbols. (…) As… Read More »
Interferential Axiology: Excess & Disruption
What is tragic about choice is no longer fundamental if choice is no longer what establishes communication between an independent city and an independent individual as substances. —Gilbert Simondon1 Excess and disruption are different modes of systemic interferences, providing differing sets of axiological implications. This essay seeks to explore their tragic interface in the… Read More »
Here & Elsewhere, at War, & Into the Future
The Middle East continues to painfully be a primary site for the blood-drenched transformations of our planetary geopolitical system. However, about ten years ago and during another Israeli operation in Gaza, an uncanny timeliness opened an unexpected connection between global contemporary art and geopolitics in August 2014 when, following the escalation of Israel’s Gaza operations,… Read More »
Zionism Reconsidered
The seminal essay below by Hannah Arendt, spanning 15,000 words was first published in the Menorah Journal in October 1944. This work was inspired by the meeting of the World Zionist Organization’s American section in Atlantic City. This congress was notable for its assertive call for a Jewish state covering the entire territory of Palestine,… Read More »
The Dead God, A short story in two parts
Things had been getting strange at the firm, since the boss had come back from holidays. The black cape and the pile of Crowley books strewn about the office were the first clue. What was Hardeep, the Singaporean tech bro CEO, doing with all this, mused Pierre, a level 7 sales executive, en route to… Read More »
The Purist
Filipe Felizardo is a philosophy student, artist and musician from Lisbon, with an informal education in film, comics, and musical pedagogy. Currently a Researcher on Critical Philosophy at the New Centre for Research & Practice, Felizardo focuses on systematic reconceptions of learning and alienation, as understood from the workspaces of inferentialism, Marxist activity-approach, and anti-vitalism.
Retinol: A Mode of Action
“Condensed in a formula, the Technological Civilization can be characterized as the transition from ratio to generativity, from matter to process, from nature to the hybrid.” –Davor Löffler If we follow the self-avowed German Accelerationism and deep futurology of Davor Löffler (Löffler 2021), we can posit that everything is co-evolutionary and that there are no… Read More »
The Narcissist Image
In his course Deleuzian Aesthetics Fares Chalabi presents an extended typology of mutually exclusive, rigorously defined image-types, or what I like to call aesthetic structures or aesthetic logics. An image-type or aesthetic logic is a form that structures the entirety of a work of art – take, for example, the ‘series’. The logic of series,… Read More »
Sorry You Can’t Pass a Turing Test But I’m Different
Five hundred million individuals tried to monetize their social media last year, according to a recent Linktree survey. As a lucky member of this esteemed group, I recently found myself surfing through the entrepreneurial side of TikTok, captivated by a video titled “How to make money with Chat GPT”. The clip tells you to go… Read More »
Unthought Apparitions
In this video essay, Brent Cox works through the poetry of Barbadian poet Kamau Brathwaite and his Sycorax Video Style, which he developed in the early 1980s using a Mac SE/30 and which offers myriad compelling extra-linguistic or extra-conceptual ideas in relation to citationality, literary convention, the constative/performative distinction, the temporality of neologisms, and the… Read More »
The Work of Art in the Age of Cybernetic Criticism
Walter Benjamin’s seminal 1935 essay “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” wrestled with the effects of powerful technologies upon culture, and presaged much subsequent writing, e.g. Martin Heidegger and Italo Calvino. Here I want to consider not the artwork-qua-object as in Benjamin, but rather the work of art as an active force, in… Read More »
Modern Art: A True Conspiracy
*Originally delivered as a response to Gertrude Stein’s “The Making of Americans” on Day 27 of Superconversations, a collaboration between e-flux and The New Centre for Research & Practice in 2015. The most recent wartime Christmas in New York was as cold and bright as any other holiday season had ever been in the city. As usual, a… Read More »
Cosmotechnics & the Multicultural Trap
1. Although still a young writer and researcher, it is probably not an exaggeration to say that Yuk Hui is already one of the most influential contemporary thinkers of technology working today. This position is certainly warranted by the strength and scope of his work, the expansive drive and breadth of which is inspiring, especially… Read More »
Pandemic, Time for a Transversal Political Imagination*
I: Symptoms With the omnipresence of the term “symptom” these days, it seems that a plausible escape from the deep horror of this pandemic would be to conduct a symptomatic reading of it. Attributed to Louis Althusser, this method of reading literary and historical texts focuses not on what a text evidently expresses, but on… Read More »
Generation Z: Invincible, Angry & Radical*
*Originally published by BBC Persian, to read the original, please click here. Following the protests that are taking place in Iran after the killing of Mahsa Amini by the forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the attention of the people and the media has been drawn to the role, and strong presence of the… Read More »
Law & Platform Architecture
Note: This piece was co-produced as a dialogue in the manner of a feedback between the authors. They reacted to each other’s thoughts on Law about Space while having as a single rule that each would use a different language as a tool of communication. Zé would use written text, whereas Artemis would use visual expressions. When… Read More »