April 7, 2020
Photo by Mehdi Monem, https://instagram.com/mehdimonem77

Political Geography of COVID-19 Pandemic

Despite the rhetoric of globalization, nations have historically remained walled off behind militarized borders. Over the last few years, even greater restrictions have been imposed on those most troubled by wars, tyranny, and economic sanctions. Despite all that, a cough, due to COVID-19, cannot be contained in one place, either in a nation or in a body. Some analysts have suggested that, in the age of COVID-19, the distinction line between rich and poor have been erased. Celebrities such as Madonna have echoed that thought, calling Covid-19 a great equaliser: “What’s terrible about it is that it’s made us all equal in many ways, and what’s wonderful about it is that it’s made us all equal in many ways.”

It is true that all communities, regardless of whereabouts and social class, are facing their vulnerabilities and precariousness of life. However, we are not vulnerable equally, as groups of people reduce their vulnerability by relying on socioeconomic structures (or relations) that exploit other groups of people and leave them vulnerable. [1] After COVID-19, rich people’s lives are not as easy as they used to be due to the limitation of access to social services, after all the “self-sufficient rich” proves to be a false idea. The pandemic has created a space to interrogate dominant assumptions about society and economy. Yet, COVID-19, is not an equaliser. As an example, the right to self-protection against the current pandemic is not equally accessible among different factions of society and among different parts of the world. In fact, COVID-19 is the great highlighter of inequalities. It has stripped the world of its ideological veneer, further exposing existing injustices. Today everybody has to pay attention to every cough, an illness in one part of the world is an illness in the whole, and society cannot heal until all members are healed. In a sense, the wellbeing of the society is contingent upon saving the lives of all, including those whose lives are considered less worthy of saving.

Social Responsibility vs. Individual Interests
Only a few weeks ago, equal access to health and education as basic human rights, advocated for by the US presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, were illustrated as a “communist” threat to basic American values in the US media outlets. Those whose access to health was limited were expected to choose martyrdom so that capitalism remains in tune with values perceived American. Ironically, the overriding issue in American media now is the question of whether the state is taking enough responsibility to guarantee the survival of all or not. Poor and marginalized people’s access to health is no longer considered a threat to American values, it is, on the contrary, considered to be the basic principle of survival for the society as a whole.

According to the New York Times, “A study from Delhi, India, one of the world’s most economically polarized cities, found that its slums served as citywide accelerants for an influenza outbreak. ‘Public health isn’t just about your own personal health, it’s about the health of the public at large,’ Dr. Errett said. ‘If there’s one person who can’t get treatment, that person is posing a risk to everyone.”

Responsibility towards the other, only a few weeks ago before the pandemic, was a blasphemous topic in societies obsessed with individualism and a commitment to laissez faire economics. It is now brutally evident that the only way to overcome a universal catastrophe is by taking sociopolitical responsibility towards the pain of the most marginalized people. Even the suffering of animals disdainfully kept in a cage, under the complete control of human will, can not remain contained. Thus, COVID-19 proves social transformation towards more equality is an urgent need for mere social survival, and not merely a matter of sloganeering.

Too Close But Too Far
As COVID-19 was spreading in Iran, a joke was being shared on social media: “we, humans, came to this world by eating an apple, and we left this world by eating a bat.” Soon enough, it became clear that the bats were not to be blamed, but rather humans’ interventionist environmental behaviour was the true culprit. It has turned out that one of the possible reasons for the emergence of COVID-19 was the compromised immune system of bats. In a piece published on CNN, Andrew Cunningham, Professor of Wildlife Epidemiology at the Zoological Society of London, explained that the stress imposed on bats (by human activity) results in their immune systems being compromised, leaving them more susceptible to viruses and slower to recovery. Given their proximity to humans and other species, due to humans’ destruction of their habitat, we witness zoonotic spillover from distressed animals to people, and contemporary lifestyle spreads the viruses throughout the world more rapidly than ever before. Being too close to a compromised immune system, seems to be an inevitable consequence of the dynamics of exploitation, be it ecological or economic. Hence, it has become obvious that a withdrawal from invaded spaces is a necessity for survival of the biosphere.

The current catastrophe, in a sense, is to be blamed on the poor treatment of species that humans consider expendable, and ultimately on pre-existing conditions: global and domestic inequalities. Recently, a tiger Nadia was test positive for COVID-19 at the Bronx zoo in New York, Bronx has been considered to be at high risk with the current pandemic due to, “high numbers of residents living in multigenerational housing with a relative lack of resources.” The wellbeing of the entire ecosystems and other living beings, including the distressed bats, is inseparable from the wellbeing of the human individual and vice versa. Rich New Yorkers who recently panic-fled to the Hamptons to escape COVID-19 brought class war with them, “along their disdain and disregard for the little people — and in some cases, knowingly […] coronavirus”; they caused a shortage of food for the poor and locals in the city, due to panic-buying, and some arrived already infected by the virus. The locals in the Hamptons were also left worrying about a shortage in medical care personnel and equipment. Proximity here, contrary to its appearance, does not indicate the existence of community, togetherness, and friendship. Rather it demonstrates structural separation and a lack of social responsibility. Perhaps that is the reason there was a suggestion bruited by local Hamptonians: “We should blow up the bridges. Don’t let them in.” Distancing here is not about protecting nationalistic identities against cosmopolitanism. It is not the same as the militarization of the borders.

A woman, coughing freely, had jeopardized the wellbeing of people around her in a bus in Detroit. The bus driver Jason Hargrove, a few days before passing away, had criticized the individual and systemic irresponsibility that had left social service providers like him the most vulnerable.

“’I feel violated. I feel violated for the folks that was on the bus when this happened,’ he said, adding: ‘To those who are watching, this — this is real. And y’all need to take this serious.’”

Distancing here is to create a respectful space for the survival of both sides with a particular attention paid to the more fragile groups most susceptible to harm and with less privilege for self-protection. The Italian philosopher Roberto Esposito explains that community “binds individuals to something that pushes them beyond themselves.” [2] One must free themselves in a community for that sense of togetherness to be formed, they must expose themselves to the “contagion” of the other. Modernity, perhaps with more force in its Western version, activates an immunitarian response to defend the individual against the community, and immunity “reconstructs their identity by protecting them from a risky contiguity with the other, relieving them of every obligation toward the other [..]” [3] The current social distancing, in response to COVID-19 can be superficially understood to be the triumph of immunity (i.e. the return of individuals to themselves and the separation of individuals from their community for self-protection) over being together. Social distancing, however, is imposed as a means of survival and also protects the other. It stems from an ethic of responsibility and care. Ironically, however, this new distancing has created more of a sense of community and responsibility. Even the Prime Minister of the UK, a child of the Thatcher revolution, has come to the realization that society, as opposed to only “individuals,” exists after all:

“In his video message, Johnson said: ‘We are going to do it, we are going to do it together. One thing I think the coronavirus crisis has already proved is that there really is such a thing as society.’”

That is the reason that the carceral society with its prisons, homelessness, starvation, draconian immigration policies, and lack of access to health and medicine are no longer considered to be safe for survival. None of these are new conditions, none have become unsafe recently; they have only happened to be felt and considered more widely after the outbreak of the pandemic.

The Nation and Its External Enemy
The fragile immune systems that wars and economic sanctions compromise haunt the wellbeing of the world, not only in terms of memory and trauma, but also material physical health. This responsibility (towards the other) lies not only with populations inside nations and their governments, it is also required between nation-states and the nations that they keep under domination (for example, the Iranian people under the economic sanctions led by the US, and Palestinians under the occupation and blockade of the government of Israel). The US-led economic sanctions against Iraq (1990-2013) were one of the greatest public health crimes of recent years. As a result of the sanctions and destruction of health infrastructure during the First Gulf War (1990-1991), there was a shortage of antibiotics, led to a tragic phenomenon, Omer Devachi calls, antibiotic anarchy:

“Certain antibiotics would be available one day and disappear another. Doctors switched antibiotics regularly, not according to treatment protocols but according to availability. Patients and their families begged relatives abroad to mail back supplies, or otherwise scrambled to locate scarce antibiotics spread across the country’s pharmacies stocked with counterfeit and expired medications.”

The antibiotic anarchy resulted in antibiotic resistance in Iraq. In the aftermath of the invasion of Iraq by the US in 2003, a bacterium that US military surgeons named “Iraqibacter” was considered an invisible enemy. It caused serious infection among US military personnel. The social history of this bacteria is related directly to the ecologies of war, including the US sanctions, in the region.

In the more recent history of interventionism, US economic sanctions have resulted in the limitation of the access of Iranians to health care, particularly medicine. The effects of the sanctions have been exacerbated by their recent intensification by the Trump administration. People whose close family members are in the hospital have to personally smuggle in the necessary medicines, and pay a fortune to acquire them on markets. A hospital-acquired infection (HAI), called nosocomial, is a widespread danger for most immune-compromised patients, yet its medication is sometimes rare to find in Iran’s hospitals.

According to Lancet, “Despite WHO and other international humanitarian organisations dispatching supplies and medical necessities, the speed of the outbreak and the detrimental effects of sanctions have resulted in reduced access to life-saving medicines and equipment, adding to the health sector’s pre-existing requirements for other difficult health conditions.”

The health problems of an Iranian with a compromised immune system, due to the US economic sanctions, eventually will have to be treated in another body in another city, perhaps even in the US itself.

The Iranian government postponed the news of COVID-19 in Iran to after the 11th parliamentary election and the commemoration of the 1979 Revolution; the commemoration orchestrated widespread protests all over Iran, which probably spread the disease further. It is rather ironic that Ali Shariati, the theoretician of the same revolution that the Iranian government put the lives of people in danger to commemorate, described the lack of sociopolitical responsibility as the main source of his social discontent of his time. That’s the reason he argued a total revolution in our understanding of the social relations is urgently needed to equate the ethical with taking responsibility towards the abolition of domination in the society. The fate of the 1979 Islamic Revolution is tragic so far, but perhaps the gleam of hope can be found in the ways the society is using solidarity to survive despite the scarcity of antibiotics and manipulations of the government.

The virus is perhaps giving the authorities the chance to experiment with more advanced techniques for future surveillance and control, but it is also creating a space to see the interconnectedness of structures of injustice, and the fact that the survival of the community is contingent upon the survival of its most marginalized members. Social distancing coincided with Nowruz, Iranian New year, during which eid didani, new year visitations, happen. Due to social distancing, my relatives, in Iran, video conference called each other this year, and I was part of several of them, joining them from Raleigh, NC. This was the first time I was attending in Nowruz visitations after moving to the US. Social distancing does not necessarily have to be indifference and separation, it can also result in creating spaces of mutual survival and a chance to strengthen the communities. The interconnectedness of ecosystems’ and peoples’ well-being, and the recognition of us mutually needing each other, points towards a transnational politics of collaboration, towards global access to health as a basic human right. Overall, the current situation requires social revisioning. That process may, at long last, be underway.

 

NOTES
[1]: Decolonizing Enlightenment. Transnational Justice, Human Rights and Democracy in a Postcolonial World, ed. Nikita Dhawan. Opladen, Berlin & Toronto: Barbara Budrich, pp. 182

[2]: Terms of The Political: Community, Immunity, Biopolitics, by Roberto Esposito, 49.

[3]: ibid.

More Articles from &&&

Ruangrupa: Contemporary Art or Friendship Industry?*

In the past two decades, more than in the past hundred years, authoritarian regimes have risen to power globally. Today, fascist parties are occupying seats in many countries’ governments, such as in the Israeli Knesset, the Dutch Tweede Kamer, the American Congress, and the German Bundestag. Meanwhile, the collective memory of European fascism and its… Read More »

Call the Bronze Age… they forgot their pictograms!

“In the preceding chapter we discussed the development of technoeconomic organization and the establishment of social machinery closely connected with the evolution of techniques. Here I propose to consider the evolution of a fact that emerged together with Homo sapiens in the development of anthropoids: the capacity to express thought in material symbols. (…) As… Read More »

Interferential Axiology: Excess & Disruption

What is tragic about choice is no longer fundamental if choice is no longer what establishes communication between an independent city and an independent individual as substances. —Gilbert Simondon1   Excess and disruption are different modes of systemic interferences, providing differing sets of axiological implications. This essay seeks to explore their tragic interface in the… Read More »

Here & Elsewhere, at War, & Into the Future

The Middle East continues to painfully be a primary site for the blood-drenched transformations of our planetary geopolitical system. However, about ten years ago and during another Israeli operation in Gaza, an uncanny timeliness opened an unexpected connection between global contemporary art and geopolitics in August 2014 when, following the escalation of Israel’s Gaza operations,… Read More »

Zionism Reconsidered

The seminal essay below by Hannah Arendt, spanning 15,000 words was first published in the Menorah Journal in October 1944. This work was inspired by the meeting of the World Zionist Organization’s American section in Atlantic City. This congress was notable for its assertive call for a Jewish state covering the entire territory of Palestine,… Read More »

The Dead God, A short story in two parts

Things had been getting strange at the firm, since the boss had come back from holidays. The black cape and the pile of Crowley books strewn about the office were the first clue. What was Hardeep, the Singaporean tech bro CEO, doing with all this, mused Pierre, a level 7 sales executive, en route to… Read More »

The Purist

Filipe Felizardo is a philosophy student, artist and musician from Lisbon, with an informal education in film, comics, and musical pedagogy. Currently a Researcher on Critical Philosophy at the New Centre for Research & Practice, Felizardo focuses on systematic reconceptions of learning and alienation, as understood from the workspaces of inferentialism, Marxist activity-approach, and anti-vitalism.

Retinol: A Mode of Action

“Condensed in a formula, the Technological Civilization can be characterized as the transition from ratio to generativity, from matter to process, from nature to the hybrid.” –Davor Löffler If we follow the self-avowed German Accelerationism and deep futurology of Davor Löffler (Löffler 2021), we can posit that everything is co-evolutionary and that there are no… Read More »

The Narcissist Image

In his course Deleuzian Aesthetics Fares Chalabi presents an extended typology of mutually exclusive, rigorously defined image-types, or what I like to call aesthetic structures or aesthetic logics. An image-type or aesthetic logic is a form that structures the entirety of a work of art – take, for example, the ‘series’. The logic of series,… Read More »

Sorry You Can’t Pass a Turing Test But I’m Different 

Five hundred million individuals tried to monetize their social media last year, according to a recent Linktree survey. As a lucky member of this esteemed group, I recently found myself surfing through the entrepreneurial side of TikTok, captivated by a video titled “How to make money with Chat GPT”. The clip tells you to go… Read More »

Unthought Apparitions

In this video essay, Brent Cox works through the poetry of Barbadian poet Kamau Brathwaite and his Sycorax Video Style, which he developed in the early 1980s using a Mac SE/30 and which offers myriad compelling extra-linguistic or extra-conceptual ideas in relation to citationality, literary convention, the constative/performative distinction, the temporality of neologisms, and the… Read More »

The Work of Art in the Age of Cybernetic Criticism

Walter Benjamin’s seminal 1935 essay “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” wrestled with the effects of powerful technologies upon culture, and presaged much subsequent writing, e.g. Martin Heidegger and Italo Calvino. Here I want to consider not the artwork-qua-object as in Benjamin, but rather the work of art as an active force, in… Read More »

Modern Art: A True Conspiracy

*Originally delivered as a response to Gertrude Stein’s “The Making of Americans” on Day 27 of Superconversations, a collaboration between e-flux and The New Centre for Research & Practice in 2015. The most recent wartime Christmas in New York was as cold and bright as any other holiday season had ever been in the city. As usual, a… Read More »

Cosmotechnics and the Multicultural Trap

1. Although still a young writer and researcher, it is probably not an exaggeration to say that Yuk Hui is already one of the most influential contemporary thinkers of technology working today. This position is certainly warranted by the strength and scope of his work, the expansive drive and breadth of which is inspiring, especially… Read More »

Pandemic, Time for a Transversal Political Imagination*

I: Symptoms With the omnipresence of the term “symptom” these days, it seems that a plausible escape from the deep horror of this pandemic would be to conduct a symptomatic reading of it. Attributed to Louis Althusser, this method of reading literary and historical texts focuses not on what a text evidently expresses, but on… Read More »

Generation Z: Invincible, Angry & Radical*

*Originally published by BBC Persian, to read the original, please click here.  Following the protests that are taking place in Iran after the killing of Mahsa Amini by the forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the attention of the people and the media has been drawn to the role, and strong presence of the… Read More »

A dialogue on Law & Platform Architecture

Note: This piece was co-produced as a dialogue in the manner of a feedback between the authors. They reacted to each other’s thoughts on Law about Space while having as a single rule that each would use a different language as a tool of communication. Zé would use written text, whereas Artemis would use visual expressions. When… Read More »

Arriving from the Future: Sinofuturism & the post-human in the philosophy of Nick Land & Yuk Hui

Modernity and technics “If you think about the Silk Road in the past, there’s this idea of eastern and western people meeting on some kind of big road and maybe selling and buying things. I think this history repeats itself, and some kind of new and interesting phenomenon is happening.” —Kim Namjoon, member of the group… Read More »

Artist as a Formal System: Towards a general theory of art

For the past few years, I’ve been engaged with writing a footnote to an essay with an attempted theoretical explication of what is meant by the word “art”. For a much longer time, I’ve pursued a very abstract but also very specific direction in my own art practice – like any other artist. One little… Read More »

On Daniel Hölzl’s Grounded

“Oil is the undercurrent of all narrations, not only the political but also that of the ethics of life on earth. This undercurrent material, petroleum narrates the dynamics of planetary events from macroscopic scales such as hot and cold wars, migrations, religious and political uprisings, to micro or even nanoscopic scales such as the chemical… Read More »

The Future History of Skills

We become what we behold. We shape our tools and, thereafter, our tools shape us. — John Culkin (1967) “A Schoolman’s Guide to Marshall McLuhan” (The Saturday Review) Human creativity is often driven by lateral thinking, which according to Margaret Boden has a weakness. She posits that AI can introduce better “standards of rigor, […]… Read More »

Babylonian Neo-mustaqbal: Continental Vibe and the Metaverse

My aim here is to venture a scholarly definition of the Continental Vibe, but allow me to arrive there via an anecdote, or an impression, really – one of my earliest memories of viewing the world as a cast of signs and symbols. A somersault of senses: visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory. A sum of building blocks and a bevy… Read More »

Telos at the End: A Meditation on Dysteleological Superintelligence

I proceed from an actual fact. For all the scenarios of existential risk from Artificial Intelligence/Superintelligence, there’s always been the same thing. There’s always been this aspect, put tacitly or implicitly, either merely enlisted, or considered to be decisive. And what is it? It is the presupposed teleology. Varying in movements and outcomes, all AI-concerned… Read More »

Second-order Design Fictions in End Times

This conversation on Second-order design fiction is part of an ongoing collective research project by Fry and Perera on Technology, Cosmotechnics, Design and Resistance. In their conversation Fry and Perera explore the concept of second-order design fiction (SoDF) as an emergent means of addressing how design is understood and practiced in the context of the… Read More »

Documenta 15: Captured & Content

Documenta 15, heterogeneous, accessible, resplendent in-process and incomplete, present-here-and-now, and affirmative, is soft-imperialist, globalist art at its apex. New Edge — it’s gentle, loving, soothing, and light, art for the righteous decline of the Western enlightenment project and paean for the rise of the Global South, salvaging what it finds useful from Western ruins, vainglory,… Read More »